A custom pouch order is ready for commercial release when the accepted scope identifies what is supplied, what remains the buyer's responsibility and what needs further approval. Use an exclusions register to make missing work visible before it becomes a receiving or production surprise.
Define the complete supplied item
List pouch or rollstock identity, components, print, quantity basis and packing. Identify whether caps, inserts, cartons or other associated items are included, excluded or supplied by another party. Do not assume that a feature shown in a sample photograph belongs in the quoted scope.
BOBST separates flexible packaging process categories. The order should focus on the agreed output and specification, with any required services stated explicitly. Design assistance, print preparation and application testing should not be assumed included without confirmation.
Write an exclusions register
For each excluded or unresolved item, name the responsible owner and the record needed to close it. Examples might include buyer-supplied artwork text, a contract filler's process acceptance or a separate transport quotation. Treat unknowns as open scope, not as free services or zero-cost items.
Where the supplier proposes an alternative, state its effect on the original requirement. An accepted alternative should carry its own drawing or document reference so production and receiving know what changed.

Carry the scope into dispatch and receiving
Specify labels, documents and quantity identification required for receipt. ICC's cost-and-risk guidance helps identify selected transport obligations, but the order still needs actual packing and handover details. Give receiving staff the accepted SKU matrix and inspection references.
Map the physical assembly before reviewing exclusions
List the pouch or rollstock and every component shown or discussed: closures, caps, cords, valves, labels, inserts and other relevant parts. Use the actual project rather than a generic format catalogue. For each item, state who supplies it, its identity, quantity and supplied condition. A photograph can communicate the intended finished appearance while leaving commercial responsibility uncertain. The assembly map exposes those gaps before the order is released.
Record whether assembly is included. A component supplied separately is a different deliverable from an assembled pouch. Ask who performs the remaining operation and who owns its technical acceptance. If the buyer or another party supplies a component, identify the interface information the converter requires. Procurement should not assume that an accessory is interchangeable because its colour or visible shape resembles the sample.
Separate services from supplied goods
Create a service list for artwork, preparation, proofs, samples and any stated development work. Record the deliverable and included revision scope. Some services may be commissioned before the bulk order; others may remain outside it. Keep their authorisations and prices identifiable. A single phrase such as complete pouch solution is insufficient to tell the team whether a revised proof or another sample stage is included.
Nestlé Health Science's published PO terms distinguish goods, services and documentation within a buyer-specific agreement. That is a useful example of explicit scope, rather than a set of terms applicable to this purchase. Ask the actual commercial owners to resolve the supply and service responsibilities in their accepted order documents.
Use four states for every scope line
Mark each item included, separately quoted, excluded with another owner, or unresolved. Do not use a blank cell for both excluded and unknown. If an item is excluded, name who will provide it and the reference controlling its interface. If it is unresolved, assign a question and decision owner. An exclusion is manageable when the project has an accepted way to provide the missing work; it is a risk to execution when nobody owns it.
Add the accepted response to the final scope statement. The question register records the clarification process, but the purchase order should state the answer. Avoid pasting a long list of open questions into the order and expecting production to infer the intended supply. Preserve the supporting correspondence in the history while giving execution teams a concise active reference.
Work through the cap example completely
For the illustrative spouted pouch, identify the pouch, fitment and cap separately. Ask whether each is included, assembled or supplied apart. Obtain component references and quantities. If the cap comes from the buyer, identify who confirms its relationship to the offered fitment and what evidence is needed. A visible cap in the reference image does not settle supply, compatibility or application acceptance.
Now extend the same example to packing. Ask whether caps are already applied, packed in identified bags or handled through another agreed arrangement. Record carton labelling and the information receiving needs to reconcile quantities. These details can affect work at the next site. Keep them in the accepted scope instead of treating them as minor logistics issues that can be solved after manufacture without commercial or technical consequences.
Clarify packing and transport handovers
Ask the supplier to state outer packing, quantity identification and dispatch documents for the actual order. Obtain dimensions and gross weights when needed for a freight quotation. Record who books collection, the named handover and the destination scope. A transport term does not replace the physical packing description or the receiver's site requirements. Keep these records linked to the same quantity matrix and order revision.
For multiple destinations, state whether the supplier packs separately by site or the buyer will split the receipt later. Include the associated identification and responsibility. An offer for one combined shipment cannot be assumed to include several destination-specific packing jobs. Request clarification and obtain the accepted commercial response. This avoids a correct production quantity arriving in a form that does not match the agreed receiving plan.
Review alternatives through all affected scope lines
When an alternative construction is accepted, revisit components, services, packing and evidence. A change intended to simplify one feature may move another operation to the buyer. Compare the complete assembly and task rather than the pouch unit price alone. Ask the application and process owners to assess relevant consequences. Keep their decisions separate from procurement's acceptance of the revised commercial scope.
Record the alternative candidate, governing drawing and the exact lines it replaces. Remove superseded descriptions from the active order set while retaining history. If a component identity remains open, label the alternative conditional and name the release requirement. Do not use a broad approved alternative statement that allows later substitutions without an identifiable review.
Give each downstream team a usable handover
Provide production and receiving with the accepted supplied-item identity, quantity matrix, component status, packing instructions and relevant technical references. Finance needs the authorised service and charge scope. The teams may receive different views of the same controlled record, with access suited to their roles. They should not need to interpret the negotiation emails to discover whether an essential component is arriving separately.
Before release, ask whether every required item and action has an owner. A line can remain outside the supplier's order if the buyer has deliberately assigned it elsewhere. What matters is that the complete project can be executed from the accepted records. This makes exclusions a controlled division of work rather than a set of missing assumptions hidden behind an attractive finished-pack image.
Illustrative exclusion exercise
Imagine an offer for spouted pouches where the cap appears in the reference image but the quote does not identify its supply status. Open an assembly-scope question rather than assuming inclusion. Ask for cap identity, quantity, packing and responsibility, then route any changed assembly for the relevant technical review. Repeat the exercise for print preparation and freight. The buyer's final order should contain explicit answers, not a list of unresolved questions pasted into the PO. If an item remains outside the order, record who will provide it and how the interfaces are controlled.
A working record for this decision
Use this original worksheet with your product and supplier team. Give each row a named owner and evidence reference; a blank answer remains an open decision.
| Record | What to enter and why |
|---|---|
| Supplied item | Record pouch or rollstock, print, components, quantities and packing included in the accepted offer. |
| Services scope | Identify artwork, preparation, sampling and technical work included or separately commissioned. |
| Exclusions register | List excluded and unresolved items with responsible owner and closure evidence. |
| Accepted alternatives | Document approved deviations and their effects on drawings, application or commercial terms. |
| Receiving handover | Provide labels, documents, SKU matrix and inspection references for the actual accepted supply. |
Scope change: a practical specification example
A quotation becomes comparable only when each supplier is answering the same brief. Send the format, dimensions, proposed construction, closure, artwork count, quantity per design and destination together. If one element is undecided, identify it as an open question. Keep samples, setup charges and repeat quantities separate so the lowest-looking unit price does not conceal a different scope.
For this decision, start with the changed size, material, design or quantity. The useful output is a revised quotation linked to the revised brief. Put that output beside the relevant quotation, drawing or sample rather than leaving it in a separate email. This is an illustrative decision exercise, not a report of a completed customer trial.
Product references to make the discussion concrete
The catalogue includes flat-bottom pouches and spout pouches. These examples show different physical constructions; they are not interchangeable specifications. A box-style base gives the filled pack a distinct footprint, with separate front, back and side panels. Compare a plain top opening with a regular zipper, and use filled samples to decide the shelf depth and panel proportions.
| Format reference | Material or construction to clarify | Details to include in the brief |
|---|---|---|
| Flat-bottom pouches | Flexible laminate with paper-look or opaque outer options; the appearance alone does not identify the full layer structure. | Base width and full opened depth; net fill and product bulk. |
| Spout pouches | Flexible liquid-pack laminate with a fitted spout and cap; contact-layer and closure compatibility are reviewed for the formulation. | Fill volume and product viscosity; spout bore, position and cap. |
Use the reference pictures to identify the base, side panels, window or opening that you mean. A picture cannot supply the missing dimensions or material layers. If a photograph shows a finish or closure you do not want, state that difference explicitly; otherwise a visual reference can introduce an unintended requirement.
Complete the record before requesting the next sample
- Attach a revised quotation linked to the revised brief. Identify the product or SKU and the date of the observation.
- Record the changed size, material, design or quantity. Keep confirmed information separate from proposed values and questions for the supplier.
- Add the actual fill weight or volume, the dimension convention, material proposal and intended closure. Include the number of designs and quantity per design when requesting a quotation.
- State which question the next drawing, sample or quotation must resolve. A change of size, closure or material should remain visible alongside the earlier reference.
This record makes the next conversation specific. It lets the design, purchasing and packing teams work from the same proposed item and shows which decision still needs evidence. Review the related product pages for format details, or prepare a custom packaging brief with the unresolved requirements.

Put the decision into practice
1. Map the assembly. Check every component and service shown or discussed against the written offer.
2. Close exclusions. Assign missing work and obtain explicit supply or responsibility answers.
3. Confirm alternatives. Link accepted changes to the released specification and revised commercial scope.
4. Release a usable order. Give production, logistics and receiving the same accepted references and responsibility record.
Send Navkar Poly Print the scope checklist and request written closure of material exclusions before releasing the custom pouch order.
Sources and scope.
These references support the technical discussion. Product photographs illustrate formats; the material, dimensions and suitability of the proposed pack are confirmed for each project.
- BOBST: flexible packaging processing
Equipment manufacturer identifies distinct printing and converting processes; no Navkar machinery or commercial limits implied.
- ICC Digital Library: Incoterms questions and answers
Standards owner explains allocation of selected transport costs and risks. Exact agreed contract still controls other commercial terms.
- Nestlé Health Science: Purchase Order Terms and Conditions
Buyer-specific example separately addresses scope/hierarchy, quantities, delivery, payment, quality and documents. Its contractual terms are not universal rights or Navkar terms.
Let’s discuss your product.
Share your contents, dimensions, filling method, quantity and delivery destination. We’ll work through the proposed packaging specification with you.
Create a packaging brief
